FHI Logo
    Search fhi.org
pixel
  Infinite Menus, Copyright 2006, OpenCube Inc. All Rights Reserved.
pixel pixel
Doc Cover

Programs

Final Report for the
AIDSCAP Program in Senegal
August 1993 to October 1997

Email this to a friend

Contribute Now Sign up for E-news Help families recover in storm-devastated Haiti

This report comprehensively summarizes the FHI/AIDSCAP program in Senegal (1993-1997). The report includes a discussion of accomplishments, outcomes, implementation and management issues, as well as a series of lessons learned and recommendations.

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

I. Country Program Description

A. Introduction

B. Country Context

C. Accomplishments and Outcomes

D. Implementation and Management Issues

E. Non-Subproject Highlights

II. Lessons Learned and Recommendations

III. Subproject Highlights

IV. Attachments

Glossary of Acronyms

I. Country Program Description (continued)

C. Accomplishments and Outcomes

Capacity Building

Introduction

The purpose of AIDSCAP was to strengthen the capacity of local institutions to increase HIV risk reduction behaviors (e.g. using condoms, decreasing the number of sexual partners and seeking early and effective treatment of STIs) within specific target groups, with the overall goal of reducing the sexual transmission of HIV/AIDS. Within this context, the term "capacity building" is defined as "the process of enhancing local organizations (and the individuals within these organizations) and coalitions to design, implement and evaluate HIV/AIDS prevention programs and initiatives." The objective of capacity building is to provide local organizations with the necessary skills to implement sustainable AIDS prevention programs independently of AIDSCAP. The two main activities involved in capacity building are: strengthening organizations (organizational development) and increasing the effectiveness of coalitions (institutional development).

In order to evaluate the results of the capacity building activities of the Senegal program, data was collected using three methodologies:

  1. A Comprehensive Key Informant Interview Questionnaire (CKIIQ) focusing on technical skill building and lessons learned;
  2. A focus group discussion with partners from the field focusing on lessons learned; and
  3. A case study on policy dialogue.

The CKIIQ was administered to representatives of 35 organizations having executed projects under AIDSCAP in the four AIDSCAP regions of Senegal. The data collected in the CKIIQ were processed to produce a quantitative measurement of the change in capacity of organizations to implement sustainable AIDS prevention and control projects and interventions before and after AIDSCAP.

The responses collected during the focus group interviews were analyzed using several methodologies:

  • A critical analysis of the content and form of the interview to verify how the interview took place and evaluate the logic of the responses of the participants, with a view to improving future interviews;
  • A descriptive analysis to identify the key ideas and themes discussed; and
  • A comparative analysis of the information gathered from interviews in relation to each theme discussed to identify the dynamics of the evolution of organizations in the fight against AIDS, their successes and limitations in the field, with a view to developing lessons learned.

The results of the analyses were used in the development of the global Lessons Learned for AIDSCAP/Senegal.

Technical Skill Building

AIDSCAP/Senegal provided a wide range of technical assistance and training throughout the life of the project. Training was provided in BCC education and training, materials development, evaluation, communication strategies, STI management, condom promotion and logistics, sentinel and behavioral surveillance research, and policy dialogue. Technical assistance was given in all technical areas by Country Office (CO), Regional Office (RO) and Headquarters (HQ) staff, and national and international consultants. In addition, implementing agencies participated in national and international conferences on STI/HIV/AIDS increasing the knowledge and technical skills of agency staff.

Prior to AIDSCAP, 77 percent of the organizations had initiated projects on their own (mostly in the health sector), however the remaining 23 percent had never previously managed a project. AIDSCAP provided the opportunity for small local organizations and associations to obtain training and experience in project execution, sometimes for the first time. For many organizations, this experience enabled them to "validate" their organization in the eyes of their community lending credibility to their organizations and paving the way for future activities.

Questionnaire respondents were asked to evaluate their level of expertise and capacity in the various technical areas before and after AIDSCAP. They reported their levels as very good, good, average, weak or not applicable. It is important to note that this survey analyzes the perceptions of the respondents at the end of the project retrospectively. Due to the lack of baseline information, data should be viewed as an indicator of change, taking into account biases that may occur.

Behavioral Change Communication

In BCC, organizations were surveyed in the areas of intervention design, mass media strategies, counseling, training and development of IEC materials. Organizations reported an increase in their capacity in all areas. The greatest increase was seen in the area of BCC training where 26 percent of the organizations felt they were weak in this area before AIDSCAP, however only 3 percent stated they were weak in BCC training at the end of the project. In the areas of counseling and development of IEC materials the improvement in capacity was not as successful, however, some improvement was reported. This low level of increase in capacity was due to the fact that not all organizations implemented activities in these two areas and therefore did not benefit from technical assistance or training in this regard.

 Senegal: Capacity Building at the Grassroots

Mareme Kaire, a dynamic woman who has been working with small development initiatives and local NGOs in her village for the past 20 years, became alarmed when she realized that all that had been accomplished would be at risk because of the potential impact of AIDS. In 1992 Kaire founded L'Association Rurale de Lutte Contre le SIDA (ARLS) for the purpose of planning and implementing HIV/AIDS prevention activities. She and nine other volunteers trained themselves to be HIV/AIDS educators and developed IEC materials for use with community networks in carrying the message throughout 6 targeted villages. In 1994, ARLS received a Rapid Response grant of US$ 2,826 from AIDSCAP which enabled them to receive formal HIV/AIDS training and expand their activities to 23 villages. The members of ARLS knew that although the seroprevalence level among adults in Senegal was 0.9%, the rate in the cities where many rural young men and women were migrating because of poverty and unemployment was 22-34%. Many of those unable to find jobs ultimately drifted into commercial sex work, contracted HIV and then they and others brought it back to their partners in the villages. Kaire and ARLS realized the urgency of informing villagers about AIDS prevention before they left their village and counseling their partners in negotiating the use of condoms before they returned. "I soon realized I needed the support of the marabouts (Islamic teachers) and told them if they didn't help me make people aware of the dangers of AIDS, they would soon have no talibes (followers) left," Kaire reported. Several marabouts became active members of ARLS and one designed the logo for the association: a hatchet to symbolize ARLS helping to clear the path to behavior change. ARLS advocates the message of abstinence before marriage, fidelity in marriage and the use of condoms whenever necessary and appropriate. The original 10 volunteer educators have trained additional educators in HIV/AIDS prevention counseling, working with existing church, youth, women's and farmers groups, and ways of ensuring ongoing availability of condoms. Success of the program is recognized by the frequency with which villagers request information from the ARLS educators and ask where they can purchase condoms.

STIs

The domain of STIs covered STI services, syndromic management, laboratory methods and STI clinic management. Only three agencies executed subprojects in STI management, however all three reported improvements in all four areas. Capacity building activities in this area involved the training of personnel in STI syndromic management, training of laboratory staff, and the provision of material supports and equipment to various health structures. By the end of the project, none of the three agencies reported weak capacity in the area of STI services.

Research

In the domain of research, organizations were questioned about their capacity in the following areas: focus groups, KABP studies, interview techniques, data collection and data analysis. Organizations which conducted research under AIDSCAP (approximately 30 percent of AIDSCAP/Senegal partners) reported an increase in their capacity in all areas at the end of the project. The largest improvement was seen in interviewing techniques and the collection of data.

AIDSCAP provided technical assistance in the area of sentinel surveillance by way of assistance in the recruitment and training of personnel to conduct the surveys and assistance in the collection and analysis of information, as well as the provision of material support. The material assistance and training provided at the national level resulted in an improved system of data management and monthly monitoring. In addition, with AIDSCAP support, the "Epidemiology Bulletin" was published monthly with updated information.

Condoms

Following BCC, condom promotion was the most common activity implemented by AIDSCAP partners in Senegal. Although 37 percent of the subprojects did not include condom distribution, either due to the nature of the activity (for example, sentinel surveillance), the majority of subprojects did involve providing information on where to obtain condoms and/or referral to other health structures where information on condoms was available. In condom promotion and distribution, 42 percent of organizations reported a weak capacity at the beginning of the project, in comparison to only 16 percent at the end.

Policy Dialogue

Policy dialogue is an area which was not explicitly taken into account in the development of the majority of subprojects at the beginning of AIDSCAP, however, as the project developed, policy dialogue became a very important component in AIDSCAP/Senegal's overall strategy. By the end of the project, only 6 percent of organizations reported a weak capacity in policy dialogue, as opposed to 51 percent at the start of the project. Organizational competence in this domain was reinforced through direct collaboration with other partner agencies and government structures, as well as through BCC and training activities with religious, political, community and traditional leaders.

The reinforcement of technical capacity can also be measured in the field by qualitative analyses of improvements in the strategies used by organizations in the types of interventions chosen for implementation, communication techniques used, the level of implication of leaders and the recognition of peer educators by their communities and target populations. The impact of these activities can also be measured in terms of increased demand for condoms, increased usage of health structures by STI patients, and reported changes in sexual behavior, not only by target populations, but also by peer educators and project personnel.

Organizational and Management Skill Building

The capacity of organizations to manage projects also improved through the execution of AIDSCAP subprojects. Organizations reporting a weak ability to manage a project before AIDSCAP was 33 percent, compared to only 10 percent after the project. Particularly in the areas of project planning, financial management, accounting and creating a budget, capacities increased substantially by the end of the project. However, organizations reported little improvement in the area of fundraising. Only 14 percent reported any progress in this regard.

Partners reported increased recognition of their organizations, not only by their communities, but also by other organizations working in AIDS prevention, as a result of AIDSCAP. In addition, some organizations, have since established contracts with other donors.